Participants are talking among themselves. Not all side conversations are bad. Sometimes they can serve the same purpose as breaking up the group into twos and threes: they allow members of the group to express themselves less publicly. If there are several side conversations going, the facilitator could suggest that the other members form clusters, too. Then he or she should put a question or two on display for the clusters to discuss. If the facilitator asks each cluster to sum up its discussion and conclusions on a sheet of paper or index card, it should help focus chatters on the agenda item.
OK, that’s how side conversations can be good. In general, however, they’re distracting and annoying. There are some things that the facilitator can do to discourage chats:
- If seated, stand.
- Try to create eye contact with the chatters.
- Walk around the room, slowly, and then stand near the chatters, for as long as it takes.
- Tap on the table to call for order.
- Say that you are distracted by multiple conversations and ask to limit talking to the discussion.
- Call on the chatters by name to invite them to contribute.
It Takes All Kinds
It’s important for a manager or a facilitator to keep in mind that a meeting is work and that people work in various ways.The facilitator should exercise judgment and discretion in governing this micro society.The sidebar,”The Psychological Dynamics of Teamwork,” presents one way to better understand the members of your group.
The Psychological Dynamics of Teamwork
Problems with participation may be a factor of personality types.To facilitate interactions more effectively and efficiently, the facilitator should understand the basics of team player styles.
Glenn M. Parker explored this aspect of personality in his book, Team Players and Teamwork:The New Competitive Business Strategy (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996). His research revealed that there are four team player styles that are essential to the success of any team.We all have characteristics of each style, to a greater or lesser extent, but each of us has a dominant style.
Contributor: Provides information and focuses the group on thetask at hand.
Positive characteristics: dependable, responsible, organized, efficient, logical, clear, relevant, pragmatic, systematic Negative characteristics: shortsighted, compulsive, hung up on facts, uncreative, perfectionist Collaborator: Provides a sense of direction, gets the group to set goals, and emphasizes overall purpose.
Positive characteristics: cooperative, flexible, confident, focused on the future, conceptual, accommodating, generous, open, visionary, imaginative Negative characteristics: overly committed, overly involved, too global, overly ambitious, insensitive Communicator: Attends to “people issues” and helps the group address matters of process.
Positive characteristics: supportive, encouraging, relaxed, informal,spontaneous, helpful, friendly, patient, considerate, tactful Negative characteristics: aimless, foolish, placating, impractical, manipulative Challenger: Encourages the group to question its methods and goals, asks tough questions, and pushes the team to take reasonable risks.
Positive characteristics: candid, questioning, outspoken, straightforward, ethical, honest, truthful, principled, adventurous, brave
Negative characteristics: rigid, arrogant, self-righteous, contentious,
quibbling
Taken From : The Manager’s Guide to Effective Meetings